Skip to main content
OT Atlas

Operational technology · Industrial control systems

The field guide tooperational technology security.

Defensive knowledge for protecting cyber-physical environments — mapped as one connected system, from the sensor on the line to the standard on the shelf.

NIST SP 800-82r3 alignedSafety firstDefence onlyVendor neutral
Protocols
36
Component types
31
Hunt playbooks
22
Isometric Purdue-model stack labelled L0 physical process, L1 basic control, L2 supervisory, L3 site operations, L3.5 industrial DMZ, L4 business systems and L5 enterprise, connected by monitored conduits.
The Purdue model, level by level — the map the Atlas is organised around.

Signature reference

The Purdue model, level by level

Systems, risks, controls and monitoring guidance at every level, including Level 3.5 — select a level to read the detail.

Purdue reference architectureSelect a level to see what lives there
  • Conduit · Brokered · TLS · MFA
  • Conduit · One-way / brokered data
  • Conduit · Inspected · no pass-through
  • Conduit · OPC UA · monitored
  • Conduit · Modbus · S7comm · CIP
  • PLCs, RTUs and safety instrumented systems executing control logic.

    Conduit · 4-20 mA · fieldbus

Command search

Search the Atlas

One index across protocols, components, vendors, industries, vulnerabilities, techniques, hunts, incidents and guides — narrowed the way an OT engineer thinks. Press ⌘K anywhere.

309 entries indexedFull search page →

Type a term, or narrow by a protocol on your wire and the component it runs on — results span protocols, components, vendors, industries, incidents, hunt playbooks, ATT&CK techniques and hardening guides.

Context

Why OT security is not IT security

Defensive guidance must account for performance, reliability and safety constraints.

AreaITOT
Primary priorityConfidentiality, then integrity and availabilitySafety and availability, then integrity; confidentiality usually last
AvailabilityPlanned downtime is normalDowntime may be measured in lost production or public service
SafetyRarely a direct factorPhysical harm is a credible consequence
PatchingFrequent, often automatedVendor-validated, scheduled into maintenance windows
Lifecycle3–5 years10–30 years; unsupported systems are common
ProtocolsStandard, generally authenticated and encryptedIndustrial protocols, frequently unauthenticated by design
Operating systemsCurrent, centrally managedMixed, including embedded and end-of-life systems
Change windowsWeekly or on demandTied to outages and turnarounds
ConsequencesData loss, financial and reputationalPhysical, environmental, safety and community impact
MonitoringAgents and active scanningPassive collection preferred; active probing can disrupt
Incident responseIsolate and rebuild quicklyCoordinate with operations; safety and process stability come first
OT Atlas and RWP Ventures connected by purpose: knowledge informs execution; execution improves knowledge.

Connected by purpose

OT Atlas

Open knowledge, education, reference material, defensive guidance and practitioner tools.

RWP Ventures

Advisory, assessment, architecture, implementation, engineering and ongoing operations.

Knowledge by OT Atlas. Execution by RWP Ventures.

Visit RWP Ventures(opens in a new tab)